Soixante-quinze
Soixante-quinze — seventy-five, for the field gun it was said to kick like.
Gin, lemon and sugar lengthened with champagne — a sour that arrives in a flute and drinks far more easily than it should.
Named from the ingredients as written, including those carried in from sub-recipes. This is not a guarantee — check the labels on what you actually buy, and note that a product’s recipe can change.
Chill a champagne flute.
Shake the gin, lemon juice and sugar syrup hard with ice for 12 seconds.
Strain into the flute, which should now be about a third full.
Top slowly with the champagne, pouring against the inside of the glass rather than into the middle.
Do not stir it. The pour mixes it well enough and a spoon knocks the bubbles out.
Twist the lemon peel over the top and drop it in.
Nobody has rated this recipe yet.
Sign in to rate this recipe. One rating per person, and you can change it.
Sharp, dry and much more serious than the glass suggests. Lemon leads and it leads hard — 15ml of fresh juice in a small volume is a real slug of acid — and the sugar syrup only just holds it in check. Behind that the gin shows as juniper and coriander seed, drier and more aromatic than sweet, and the champagne brings a second, different kind of acidity: wine acid rather than citrus acid, plus whatever bready, yeasty character the bottle has. The two acids stack rather than blend, which is why the drink tastes so bracing. There is almost no sweetness in the finish at all.
Citrus oil above everything, from the twist and from the juice, and it arrives before the glass reaches your mouth. Under it, juniper and the faint pine-and-pepper of a London dry gin, and then the wine — brioche and green apple in a champagne, more neutral and floral in a cava or a prosecco. The bubbles are doing the delivery: carbonation carries aromatics up out of a narrow glass far more efficiently than a still drink can, which is most of the reason the flute is the right shape.
Light, prickly and very dry. The carbonation is the texture — it scrubs the tongue and stops the sugar syrup ever reading as syrupy — and the drink has no weight or body of any kind. It is a thin drink on purpose. As it goes flat it gets noticeably heavier and sweeter, which is why it should be drunk quickly.
Two sounds and both are short. The shake is twelve seconds of hard rattle, brighter and shorter than most because there is so little liquid in the shaker. Then the pour, which should be almost silent against the side of the glass, and a rising hiss as the wine hits the sour underneath it. After that the drink makes a faint continuous fizz for as long as it lasts, which is audible if the room is quiet and is the sound of it going flat.
Aroma first and it is all citrus. Then a hard sour hit, then a wave of bubbles that carries it across the whole mouth, then the gin's juniper arriving late and slightly warm at the back. The finish is long, dry, and mostly wine — the champagne is the last thing you taste, not the first, which is the opposite of what the pour order suggests. Across the glass it changes fast: the first mouthful is aggressive and effervescent and the last one, four minutes later, is soft, flat, and noticeably sweeter.
Cold, and it must stay cold — this is a drink with a short life. Served at fridge temperature in a chilled flute it holds for about five minutes before the wine warms and the bubbles slow, and a warm glass halves that. It is never served over ice in this build; a French 75 poured over ice in a collins glass is a real and popular variation but it is a longer, weaker, different drink.
Salt and fat, and the sharper the better. Oysters, which share the wine's job. Salted almonds, crisps, gougères, anything fried and small. Smoked salmon. It is a very good cocktail with a plate of charcuterie and an actively bad one with anything sweet, which it strips of all its sugar. It also works before a meal rather than during one, since it wakes the palate up rather than settling it.
Easy. There is one shake, one strain and one careful pour, and the only thing that needs any judgement at all is the last of those. If you can make a gin sour you can make this; if you have ever topped up a glass of prosecco without it foaming over, you already have the technique.
Moderate to high, and entirely because of the wine. Gin, lemon and sugar come to very little per drink; 90ml of champagne is most of the cost and a good third of a bottle across four drinks. This is the rare cocktail where using the cheaper ingredient is defensible — see Keeping the cost down.
A shaker and a strainer, a citrus squeezer, a jigger, and a champagne flute you have put in the fridge. Nothing specialised. A bottle stopper for sparkling wine is worth owning if you make these one at a time, because the alternative is committing to four.
At the start of an evening, and while the wine is cold. It is a poor drink to make for one person unless you have a stopper for the bottle.
None, though it reads as a summer drink and is at its best on a warm evening. Lemons are at their best in winter, which is a small argument for making it at Christmas.
The flute fills in two visible stages: a cloudy pale sour in the bottom third, then a clear rising column as the wine goes in, and after a few seconds the whole glass settles to a single slightly hazy pale gold with a fine stream of bubbles running up the middle. If the head foams up over the rim, the wine was too warm or poured too fast. If the drink looks completely clear, you used bottled lemon juice.
Not applicable in the usual sense — the test is the bead. A properly poured French 75 has a steady thread of small bubbles still rising after a minute. Large lazy bubbles that stop quickly mean the carbonation was knocked out during the pour.
Nothing raw and nothing to manage. The one thing worth saying out loud is the strength: this is a full measure of gin under a glass of wine, it looks like an aperitif, and it is roughly twice one.
Pouring the champagne into the middle of the glass, which foams it over the rim, knocks out the carbonation and leaves you with two thirds of a drink. Stirring it afterwards, which finishes the job. Using warm wine. Using bottled lemon juice, which in a drink with four ingredients is immediately obvious. And making it with a sweet sparkling wine on top of sugar syrup, which turns a dry, bracing drink into a sticky one.
Foamed over: the wine was too warm, or poured too fast, or poured into the middle. Wait for the foam to fall and top it up rather than starting again. Flat within a minute: same cause, or the glass was not clean — detergent residue kills a bead instantly, which is why champagne glasses are traditionally rinsed and not washed. Too sour: the lemon was large; add a couple of millilitres of syrup, not more gin. Tastes of nothing much: the wine is sweet, or the gin is too soft — this drink wants a proper juniper-forward London dry, and a gentle contemporary gin disappears under the lemon.
The sour part only. Gin, lemon and syrup can be batched and kept cold for a few hours — beyond that the lemon dulls — and then measured out and topped to order. Never pre-mix the wine into anything.
None. It is a sparkling drink and it is finished within a few minutes of being poured.
Not applicable.
No.
The rest of the bottle is the real leftover, and a sparkling wine stopper keeps it drinkable for a couple of days. An opened bottle left unstoppered is flat by the next morning and no longer any use for this.
The sour part scales cleanly to any number; the wine does not, because it has to be poured into each glass separately. For six people, batch 180ml gin, 90ml lemon and 60ml syrup, shake it in two lots, and open one bottle, which is almost exactly six pours of 90ml with a little to spare.
The big one is cognac in place of gin, which has a serious following — it is the standard build in New Orleans and makes a rounder, warmer, less aromatic drink. It is not a worse drink; it is a different one, and which is 'correct' is an argument with no settled answer. On the wine: any dry sparkling wine works and should be genuinely dry — a brut cava or a decent crémant does this job well and a demi-sec or a sweet prosecco makes the drink cloying, because there is already sugar syrup in the glass.
Vegan and gluten-free as written, with the caveat that some wines are fined with animal products and very few say so on the label. There is no good alcohol-free version: the drink is gin and wine, and replacing both leaves lemon, sugar and bubbles, which is lemonade.
A classic London dry gin, with juniper properly forward — this is a drink that needs the gin to argue back against the acid. For the wine, anything labelled brut or extra brut; avoid anything labelled dry, which in sparkling wine confusingly means sweet. Unwaxed lemons if you can get them, since the peel goes into the glass.
Use a good crémant or cava rather than champagne. This is one of the few cocktails where that is not a compromise but arguably an improvement: the drink already has a great deal going on, the wine is being used as a dry, acidic lengthener rather than admired on its own, and the bready complexity you pay for in champagne is largely lost under gin and lemon. Spend the difference on the gin, which you will taste.
The wine dominates the footprint, as it does the cost. Buying a bottle that will be finished is the only meaningful lever; a half-drunk bottle poured away the next day is the waste worth avoiding.
Around 170 calories and roughly 1.6 UK units, most of the alcohol coming from the gin rather than the wine even though the wine is three times the volume. That imbalance is the whole reason for the name.
Worth it, and it is the best answer to the question of what to do with sparkling wine at a party. It takes a minute, it uses a third of the wine per drink so a bottle stretches further than it looks, and it is genuinely better than either of its halves. The one caution is the one in the name: people drink it like wine and it is not wine.
Paris, at some point in or shortly after the First World War, though the details are less firm than most accounts make them sound. The bar most often named is Harry's New York Bar.
Soixante-Quinze in French — literally 'seventy-five'. It has also appeared simply as the 75 Cocktail, which is where much of the confusion about its ancestry comes from, since more than one unrelated drink was printed under that name in the 1920s.
In English, 'French seventy-five'. In French, swah-sont-KEEZ.
The Canon de 75 modèle 1897 — the French 75mm quick-firing field gun, the standard French artillery piece of the First World War and famous for its rate of fire. The drink is named for the kick.
The lineage is genuinely tangled and it is worth stating that rather than picking a story. Drinks called the '75' appear in print in the 1920s with builds that are not this one — some with calvados or applejack, some with grenadine, some with gin — and Harry MacElhone's own books are among them. The gin, lemon, sugar and champagne version that everyone now means is firmly established by the Savoy Cocktail Book in 1930, credited there without much ceremony. So the drink and the name almost certainly did not arrive together, and the popular account of MacElhone inventing this exact recipe in 1915 is a tidy story laid over a messier record.
It is the champagne cocktail people order when they want a drink rather than a gesture, and it has become shorthand for a particular kind of glamour — interwar Paris, and then, through Casablanca, Hollywood's version of it. In New Orleans it has a second and separate life built on cognac.
Celebrations, and specifically the first drink of one. Weddings, New Year, birthdays. It is an aperitif by temperament: bracing, dry, and better before food than after it.
Shaking the sour part and topping with wine, rather than building everything in the glass. Building it whole is faster and produces a flatter, less integrated drink, because the sugar never properly dissolves and the shake is where the lemon and gin come together.
The base spirit is the great unsettled question — gin in the Savoy and in most of the world, cognac in New Orleans and in a good number of American bars. The glass has moved around too: flute, coupe, and in some places a collins glass over ice. The sugar has quietly come down over the last century, as it has in most classic sours.
New Orleans makes it with cognac and has an entire bar named after it. Italy makes it with prosecco, which is drier in style than it is usually given credit for and works well. A gin-free version with cognac and no citrus is sometimes served as a French 76 or 125 depending on who is behind the bar, and those numbers are not standardised in any meaningful way.
It does not, much — this is the standard modern gin build. The two things stated more firmly here than in most recipes are the pour technique, because pouring into the middle of the glass rather than down its side is the commonest way to flatten the drink, and the instruction not to stir at all.
The Savoy Cocktail Book, 1930, for the recipe as it is now understood. The attribution to Harry MacElhone circulates very widely and is not contradicted by anything here, but it is not evidenced for this particular build and is not stated as fact.